316L Stainless Steel Ring with matte and shiny polish. Width: 8mm

Posted: July 13th, 2010 | Author: | Filed under: For Men | Tags: , , , , , , , | 5 Comments »

  • 316L Surgical Stainless Steel Ring
  • with matte and shiny polish.
  • Comfort fit.
  • Width: 8mm

Product Description
316L is the highest quality of Surgical Stainless Steel in the jewelry market and that is exactly what all of our jewelry is made from. It won’t change color, leave staines on your body, and it does not require any maintenance to keep it looking brand new. In fact, it is so good at resisting fade, rust and corrosion, that this grade of steel is often used in marine environments and since it is nickel free it is also used in surgical procedures.

316L Stainless Steel Ring with matte and shiny polish. Width: 8mm

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Twitter

5 Comments on “316L Stainless Steel Ring with matte and shiny polish. Width: 8mm”

  1. 1 D. Pham said at 7:24 am on July 13th, 2010:

    Pros:

    - Inexpensive

    - Nice design

    Cons:

    - Uncomfortable

    - Scratches and nicks easily

    - Cheap material

    - Flat, sharp edge scratches and irritates other fingers

    - Flat edges collect dirt

    Thoughts:

    You get what you pay for. This is no exception. I still have this ring, but I don’t wear it. I wore it for about a week until I got tired with it. I actually went and got a tungsten carbide ring of the same size (10) to replace this one and the new ring fits way better. Bother are the same width, 8mms. I’ve been using the new tungsten carbide ring ever since.

    Having beveled edges and a better design makes all the difference. The ring shown here has a nice looking design, but in function that flat sharp edge does wonders at scratching and irritating. The material used is not very strong. It is only a small step up from aluminum. Save the trouble and get a tungsten carbine/titanium ring if this is your style.

    Bottom line:

    Not Recommended.
    Rating: 2 / 5

  2. 2 Jennifer Simmons said at 7:53 am on July 13th, 2010:

    The outer edges on this ring are not blunted at all. It was uncomfortable to try on– I can’t imagine actually wearing it! The sharp edges chafed against the middle and pinkie fingers. Pretty ring, though.
    Rating: 1 / 5

  3. 3 Samuel J. Green said at 10:14 am on July 13th, 2010:

    Quick shipping. Received wrong size by mistake, but company quickly sent me the correct size and credited my account with the shipping charge. Beautiful ring-many compliments.
    Rating: 5 / 5

  4. 4 David A. James said at 12:36 pm on July 13th, 2010:

    Bought this for my husband who tends to lose things easily. He wears it as his wedding band to work so he doesnt lose or scratch up his real band. For under $10 its a great buy, even if just to provent loss or scratches to a valuable ring.
    Rating: 5 / 5

  5. 5 Lee Hidalgo said at 3:05 pm on July 13th, 2010:

    the picture is deceiving, its thinner than what you see, but other than that its an ok ring.

    that would be the only thing wrong with the ring, IF any thing.

    but other than that, if your looking for a thick ring, this is not some thing you buy.

    Rating: 5 / 5


Leave a Reply